Lot Number MB2420 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Abscess (1690); Bacterial Infection (1735); Erosion (1750); Corneal Abrasion (1789); Corneal Edema (1791); Corneal Perforation (1792); Corneal Ulcer (1796); Hypopyon (1913); Keratitis (1944); Neovascularization (1978); Scar Tissue (2060); Uveitis (2122); Corneal Infiltrates (2231); Fungal Infection (2419)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The complaint sample was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot batch records is in progress.Additional medical information has been requested.Based on available information, no casual factors can be determined and no conclusion can be drawn.
|
|
Event Description
|
Consumer reported they were diagnosed with an eye infection (fungal fusarium) after using the solution for an extended period of time.A regulatory agency (b)(4) yellow card (reference: report overview (b)(4)) was received regarding the event.Here, the practitioner indicated that the patient had a case of fusarium keratitis in (b)(6) 2016 that resulted in a corneal perforation which required corneal gluing.Attempts to obtain additional information regarding the event are ongoing.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Attempts to obtain additional event details have been unsuccessful.The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot batch record and chemical and microbial testing of a retain sample concluded this product was formulated, manufactured and packaged according to local and global specifications.Based on all information, no causal factors can be determined and no conclusion can be drawn.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: the doctor indicated that in her opinion the fungal keratitis was associated with contact lens wear, but she could not predict the role of the solution.Based on all available information, no causal factors can be determined and no conclusion can be drawn.
|
|
Event Description
|
An event report was received from the eye care practitioner.The doctor indicated that the patient had a fusarium fungal keratitis of the left eye that included a full-thickness perforation.The patient has a 9-10 mm central corneal scar that has resulted in permanent loss of vision.Treatment included gluing of the corneal perforation, along with nystatin, veroconazole drops and tabs as rx products.The doctor indicated that in her opinion the fungal keratitis was associated with contact lens wear, but she could not predict the role of the solution.Medical information provided indicated the event occurred in (b)(6) 2017 but an exact date was not provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The complaint sample was returned for evaluation, however, the sample was insufficient to perform all required testing.The results of the chemical and microbiological testing performed were all within specification.A review of the lot batch record and complete chemical and microbial testing of the retains concluded this product was formulated, manufactured and packaged according to local and global specifications.Based on all available information, no causal factors can be determined and no conclusion can be drawn.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|