• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY2C0312
Medical Device Problem Codes Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Retraction Problem (1536); Physical Resistance (2578)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Date of Event 02/14/2017
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2017-00377.The hospital disposed of the device.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the renal artery using ruby coils.During the procedure, while advancing a ruby coil through the non-penumbra microcatheter and into the target vessel, the physician did not mention any resistance.However, due to tortuous anatomy, the microcatheter backed out of the vessel.The physician then retracted and resheathed the ruby coil back into its introducer sheath in order to reposition the microcatheter.The physician mentioned that there was resistance while the coil was being retracted.When attempting to re-deploy the ruby coil, the physician had difficulty advancing the ruby coil out of its introducer sheath.Consequently, upon applying force, the ruby coil pusher assembly became kinked.Therefore, the ruby coil was not re-deployed and a new ruby coil was opened.However, the same issue occurred and ruby coil was resheathed in order to reposition the microcatheter.While attempting to resheath the ruby coil, the physician mentioned that there was resistance and subsequently, the coil unintentionally detached before the coil could be fully resheathed.The ruby coil was already out of the patient's body and out of the microcatheter.The procedure was then completed using the same non-penumbra microcatheter and an additional coil.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key6414597
Report Number3005168196-2017-00378
Device Sequence Number650369
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548012827
UDI-Public00814548012827
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySN
PMA/510(K) Number
K120330
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,distri
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/15/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Physician
Device Expiration Date12/03/2024
Device Catalogue NumberRBY2C0312
Device Lot NumberF72984
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/15/2017
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/17/2017
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age62 YR
-
-