| Model Number |
8886661851 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Radiation Exposure, Unintended (3164)
|
| Date of Event |
02/16/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter; during a laparoscopic procedure, the needle of the suture broke off and an x-ray was utilized to search for the fragment which had fallen into the femoral artery in proximity of the vascular system and resulting in an extension of the procedure by an hour.The fragment was removed from the patient and no damage was caused by the fragment.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter; during a laparoscopic procedure, the needle of the suture broke off and an x-ray was utilized to search for the fragment which had fallen into the in the moles near the femoral artery in proximity of the vascular system and resulting in an extension of the procedure by an hour.The fragment was removed from the patient and no damage was caused by the fragment.There was no injury to the patient and no blood loss.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Evaluation summary post market vigilance (pmv) led an evaluation of one device.The visual inspection of the returned samples noted two empty foil pouches with a retainer, one suture and one broken piece of needle.The retainers were inspected with no abnormalities.The needle was broken at the swaged end.The broken swaged end of the needle was attached to a suture.It was observed, under magnification, that instrument marks were present on the broken swaged end of the needle.As no sealed products were returned, functional testing was precluded.Records from each manufacturing lot are thoroughly reviewed to ensure that products are released meeting all quality release specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the device history record indicates the product was released meeting all medtronic quality release specifications at the time of manufacture.The observed instrumentation damages suggested that the needles were grasped improperly at the swaged end of the needle during application.Firmly grasping the needle at the swaged end can deform the crimp, can cause the needle to disengage from the suture, and can cause the needle to break at the swaged end.The recommended grasping area of the needle is at the needle body, where the wire is of a full diameter.The root cause of the observed damage was misuse of the product which would have caused or contributed to the reported incident.Should new information become available, the file will be re-opened and the investigation summary amended as appropriate.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|