|
Currently, it is unknown whether the device may have caused or contributed to the reported event.The patient's attorney did not allege a specific device failure or patient injury and medical records were limited to the patient's implant op report and implant tracking log only.A manufacturing review was performed which found no anomalies during the manufacturing process.With the current information available no definitive conclusion can be made.If additional event and/or evaluation information is obtained, a follow up mdr will be submitted.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.Not returned to manufacturer.
|
|
The following is based on a review of limited medical records and the attorney's legal claim provided to davol by the patient's attorney: on (b)(6) 2007 - the patient was diagnosed with post hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and mixed urinary incontinence.The patient underwent an abdominal sacrocolpopexy, combined anterior/posterior repair with implant of a bard ptfe mesh, implant of a non-davol suburethral sling followed by cystoscopy with suprapubic catheter placement.The attorney alleges the patient experienced an unspecified adverse outcome associated to the use of the device.
|