|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents reported from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported inflation issue and there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|
|
It was reported that during a procedure to treat a target lesion in the peroneal artery, the physician advanced the 2.0 x 40 mm armada dilatation catheter into the patient anatomy.An attempt was made to inflate the balloon; however, the balloon did not fully inflate.The device was removed and a second balloon was used.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided.
|