|
Same case as mdr ids: 2134265-2017-03280, 2134265-2017-03281, and 2134265-2017-03282.(b)(4) clinical study.It was reported that coronary artery disease, stenosis, and target vessel revascularization occurred.In (b)(6) 2012, the patient presented due to unstable angina.Subsequently, coronary angiography and index procedure were performed.The target lesion was a de novo and restenotic lesion located in the proximal right coronary artery (rca) with 75% stenosis and was 10.00mm long with a reference vessel diameter of 4.5 mm.The lesion #2 was treated with direct stent placement using a 4.00x12.0mm promus element¿ plus drug-eluting study stent, with 0% residual stenosis.A stent was also placed in the left main coronary artery (lmca).One day post procedure, the patient was discharged on aspirin and clopidogrel.In (b)(6) 2015, a 3.5x38mm promus element stent was implanted in the mid right coronary artery (rca).Five days later another 3.5x38mm promus element was implanted in the mid right coronary artery (rca).In (b)(6) 2016, a 3.0x28mm synergy mr stent was implanted in the mid right coronary artery (rca).In (b)(6) 2017, the patient presented to hospital with shortness of breath, chest pain and fatigue and the patient was hospitalized on the same day.Subsequently, the planned procedure of redo-coronary artery bypass graft was performed using reverse saphenous vein graft (svg) to right dominant posterior descending artery (r-pda) to treat stenosis located from proximal rca to distal rca.Six days from the onset of symptoms, the event was considered resolved and the patient was discharged on the same day.
|