Results: two used, loose samples were returned for evaluation.A visual inspection revealed that one of the syringes' needles had penetrated its safety shield.The remaining syringe was tested for point geometry, lube, and cannula outer diameter.The point exhibited proper geometry, the outer diameter was measured as 0.0103¿ (specs: outer diameter for 31g: 0.0100¿-0.0105¿), and sufficient lube was observed.A review of the device history record could not be performed as a lot number was not provided for this incident.Conclusion: at this time, although a visual inspection confirmed that the needle of one of the returned syringes had penetrated its safety shield, an absolute root cause for this incident cannot be determined.The sample has been forwarded to the manufacturing site in (b)(4) for a secondary evaluation.Upon completion of the secondary investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.(b)(4).
|
Results: a secondary investigation was conducted by the manufacturing site in (b)(4).Two used, loose samples were returned for evaluation.A visual inspection revealed that one of the syringes' needles had penetrated its safety shield.Conclusion: our quality engineer notes that this type of defect is seen during assembly, specifically on the lodose (0.3 cc and 0.5 cc) lines.As the parts are assembled linearly, occasionally a cannula may be slightly bent and the force of shielding the hub/needle assembly is sufficient to push the cannula through the shield itself.A capa is not required at this time.Complaints received for this device and reported condition will continue to be tracked and trended.
|