|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) of rebp0006 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a hole in the aspira catheter was confirmed and the damage appears to be use related.One aspira drainage catheter was returned for investigation.The overall length of the catheter was 74.5cm.What appears to be blood residue was observed in the fibers of the cuff.A breach in the tubing was observed 8mm distal to the cuff.The adjoining surfaces of the breach were microscopically examined and were noted to be glossy and striated, which is typical of sharp instrument damage.Functional testing revealed that fluid would leak from the sharp instrument cut in the tubing.The product ifu states, ¿do not allow the device to contact sharp instruments.Mechanical damage may occur.Use only smooth edged atraumatic clamps or forceps.¿.
|