| Catalog Number |
RBY2C0825 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Failure to Advance (2524); Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
03/14/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2017-00579.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat a pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (pavm) using ruby coils.During the procedure, while attempting to advance a ruby coil through a non-penumbra microcatheter, the physician did not mention feeling any resistance; however, the coil became stuck half way through the microcatheter and was unable to advance any further.The ruby coil was then removed and a new ruby coil was opened.However, the same issue occurred and the ruby coil was unable to advance through the microcatheter.Therefore, the physician removed the ruby coil and completed the procedure using additional coils and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the ruby coil¿s pusher assembly.The pusher assembly mid-joint was retracted proximal to the introducer sheath friction lock.The embolization coil was intact with the pusher assembly.Conclusions: evaluation revealed that during functional analysis, both devices could be advanced through their introducer sheaths and a demonstration microcatheter without issue.The root cause of the ruby coils not being able to advance during the procedure could not be determined.Evaluation of the first ruby coil revealed the pusher assembly mid-joint was retracted proximal to the introducer sheath friction lock.This was likely incidental, and likely occurred after successful withdrawal of the ruby coil from the system.The non-penumbra microcatheter mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|