• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; TRACTION, APPARATUS, NON-POWERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; TRACTION, APPARATUS, NON-POWERED Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Loss of Range of Motion (2032); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: b3: eingartner, c et al(1998).Distalization of the patella during tibial callus distraction.Archives orthopaedic trauma surgery, 117: 397-398.D1, d2, d3, d4: this report is for an unknown external fixator/unknown quantity/unknown lot.D4: unknown part number, udi unavailable.H3, h4, h6: the investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn, as no device was returned.Without a lot number, a device history record review could not be conducted.H6: 3191 patient code refers to knee joint distalization of the patella.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Literature article received: this report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following literature article eingartner, c et al(1998).Distalization of the patella during tibial callus distraction.Archives orthopaedic trauma surgery, 117: 397-398.This article reports a case study of a (b)(6) woman who was treated for a grade iii a open lower leg fracture in january 1996.She was admitted to the hospital in march 1996 with a suppurating infection and underwent a soft-tissue reconstruction, osseous debridement, and a segmental resection involving tibial corticotomy below the tibial tuberositas, application of a modified ao external fixator, and initiation of segmental transportation.Consecutive x-ray series demonstrated good bone formation in the distraction zone and regular alignment of the transport segment.However, it also showed an increasing distalization of the patella.It was reported that the patient's range of motion was increasingly reduced with respect to flexion.This is report 1 of 1 for com-275208.This report is for an unknown ao external fixator.This is report 1 of 1 for com-275208.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
TRACTION, APPARATUS, NON-POWERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
michael cote
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key6507710
MDR Text Key73266572
Report Number2520274-2017-11396
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HST
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/24/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/24/2017
Initial Date FDA Received04/20/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age42 YR
-
-