|
As reported to angiodynamics on march 22, 2017: patient was receiving chemotherapy via port.The port was flushed 6-8 weeks if not in use.This port was currently in use every 2 weeks.When flushing the port, the patient reported experiencing slight pain.It was noted the port catheter had fractured.It was reported the defective device was removed and replaced.The patient did not suffer any adverse effect due to this event.It was reported that the disposable device is not available to be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.
|
|
Received three (3) smartports.One with no catheter tubing (labeled as sample #1) and 2 ports with catheter tubing (samples #2 and #3).There was no distinction between the port samples returned and the multiple complaint files opened based on the customer's reported occurrences, so the complaint samples were assigned a sample number and complaint file number, and investigated individually.A medwatch has been created for each complaint file.A visual inspection of sample #1 was performed using magnification.As received, no visible defects were noted to the smartport.The customer did not return the catheter tubing for evaluation, just the port.The port contained bio material inside the septum area.During cleaning the port flushed with no problems.The customer's reported complaint description of "catheter fractured" is confirmed, as 2 of the samples were returned with catheter tubing that was noted to be fractured.Both returned catheters with tubing exhibited a crushing fatigue failure of the catheter tubing.This along with the location of the fracture being 4-6cm from the port body indicate "pinch-off" syndrome as likely root cause for the catheter fracture.Although the complaint description is confirmed, a definitive root cause for the reported complaint description cannot be determined.A potential root cause of this failure is "pinch off syndrome".The directions for use supplied with the device instructs the physician/clinician on how to properly implant the catheter/port, and cautions against certain handling techniques to avoid "pinch-off syndrome".A review of the device history records was performed for the indicated packaging and component lots for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The instructions for use, which is supplied to the user with this catalog number, contains the following statements: potential complications: catheter fragmentation and catheter pinch-off.Catheter placement considerations: warning: avoid medial catheter placement into subclavian vein through percutaneous technique.This placement could lead to catheter occlusion, damage, rupture, shearing, or fragmentation due to compression of the catheter between the first rib and clavicle.Catheter shearing has been reported when the catheter is inserted via a more medial route in the subclavian vein.Pinch-off syndrome: pinch-off syndrome signs may include difficulty in aspirating blood, resistance to flushing or infusion of medications or fluids that improves with position changes, infraclavicular pain and/or swelling with catheter flushing or infusion palpitations, sudden onset chest pain, cardiac arrhythmias, extra heart sound, chest wall swelling at the port pocket, vein insertion site, pain in shoulder or port area not associated with swelling, cough, paresthesia of arm on side of catheter withdrawal occlusion or swishing sound with catheter flushing.Warning: avoid medial catheter placement into subclavian vein through percutaneous technique.This placement could lead to catheter occlusion, damage, rupture, shearing, or fragmentation due to compression of the catheter between the first rib and clavicle.Catheter shearing has been reported when the catheter is inserted via a more medial route in the subclavian vein.Note: if infusion or aspiration is successful upon lifting arm above the head and turning the head, consider pinch-off syndrome as a possible cause.The line should be radiologically evaluated if pinch-off syndrome is suspected.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no adverse trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.Complaint reference (b)(4).
|