Currently, it is unknown whether the device may have caused or contributed to the reported event.It is alleged the patient experienced adhesions and infection.Adhesions are listed as a known possible adverse reaction in the instructions-for-use.In regards to infection, the warning section of the instructions-for-use states "if an infection develops, treat the infection aggressively.The prosthesis may not have to be removed.An unresolved infection, however, may require removal of the prosthesis.¿ without a lot number a review of the manufacturing records could not be conducted.With the currently available information, no conclusion can be drawn.If additional event and/or evaluation information is obtained, a follow up mdr will be submitted.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.Device not returned to manufacturer.
|
The following was reported to davol by the patient's attorney: on (b)(6) 2015 - the patient underwent implant of a composix e/x mesh to treat a recurrent incisional hernia.On (b)(6) 2015 - the patient was allegedly diagnosed with "infected mesh" and required a subsequent surgery to remove the composix e/x.The surgeon excising the mesh alleged that the patient had "multiple adhesions to his abdominal wall," and performed lysis of adhesions allegedly caused by the composix e/x mesh.The attorney alleges the patient experienced infection, additional surgery, adhesions, permanent injury, defective mesh and explant.
|