• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; APPLIANCE,FIXATION,NAIL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; APPLIANCE,FIXATION,NAIL Back to Search Results
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Unstable (1667); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Non-union Bone Fracture (2369); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Williksen, john h., md, et.Al, (2015) external fixation and adjuvant pins versus volar locking plate fixation in unstable distal radius fractures: a randomized, controlled study with 5-year follow-up.Journal of hand surgery american.Volume 40, page 1333 - 1340.This is for an unknown ao fixator nail/ unkown quantity/ lot # unknown.(b)(4).The investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn, as no device was returned and no lot number or part number was provided.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following literature article: williksen, john h., md, et.Al, (2015) external fixation and adjuvant pins versus volar locking plate fixation in unstable distal radius fractures: a randomized, controlled study with 5-year follow-up.Journal of hand surgery american.Volume 40, page 1333 - 1340.(norway).The purpose of this study is to determine whether volar locking plates (vlp) are superior to external fixation (ef) with adjuvent pins in unstable radius fractures after 5 years of follow-up.One hundred fourteen (114) patients with unstable distal radius fractures were assessed in this study.Three (3) were mistakenly included.Therefore, 2 were excluded postrandomization because of previous fractures to their ipsilateral wrist and 1 because of medical contraindications.Ultimately, 111 patients received their allocated intervention (59 in the ef group and 52 in the vlp group).The patients were followed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 4 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 66 months.At the 5 years follow-up, three (3) patients died and one patient experienced a fracture fixation failure.Forty-five (45) patients with 1 a2, 10 a3.23 c1, 9 c2, and 2 c3 fractures in the ef group, two (2) of which used a distal radius fixator.Ten (10) patients had secondary surgeries due to: - two patients (2) experienced carpel tunnel syndrome; - one patient had incomplete reduction; - one experienced a miscellaneous reaction; - five (5) had a scar correction.This report is one (1) of 3 for (b)(4).This report is for unknown ao fixator involving 10 patients who underwent secondary surgeries due to carpel tunnel syndrome, incomplete reduction, a miscellaneous reaction, and a scar correction.This report is for 1 device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device code - no known device problem.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
APPLIANCE,FIXATION,NAIL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
michael cote
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key6517946
MDR Text Key73560365
Report Number2520274-2017-11471
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KTT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/28/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/25/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/08/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-