• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 304

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 304 Back to Search Results
Model Number 304-20
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Fracture (1260); Mechanical Problem (1384)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 04/18/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A system diagnostic test was performed and showed high impedance.It was also reported that patient had been manipulating the device by rotating the generator in the surgical pocket.X-ray images were reviewed by the physician and reportedly confirmed a lead fracture had occurred.The patient had a full revision surgery to replace the fractured lead and generator, and the post-op impedance values were within normal limits.While in surgery, it was reported that the lead was extremely twisted and coiled up.The explanted lead and generator have not been received by the manufacturer to date.
 
Event Description
The explanted generator and lead were both returned for product analysis.Analysis was completed on the returned generator which confirmed that the generator had performed according to all functional specifications.All diagnostic tests resulted in impedance values within expected limits for the applied loads.Data from the generator revealed that high impedance was present prior to the generator being replaced.The analysis on the lead has not been completed to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Analysis was completed on the returned lead portions, which did not include the electrodes.During the visual analysis, the outer silicone tubing had a twist and compressed appearance.Additionally, several abraded openings were identified on the lead tubing and the quadfilar coil was found to be broken approximately 3 mm from the electrode bifurcation.Scanning electron microscopy (sem) was performed on the broken coil and was unable to identify the coil fracture type.The abraded openings on the outer silicone tubing provided a leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids inside the outer silicone tubing.The set screw marks found on the lead connector pin provided evidence that at one point in time, there was a good mechanical and electrical connection between the lead and generator.Other than the abraded insulation and the lead fractures identified in the lab, the condition of the returned lead was consistent with those typically seen following explant.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 304
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key6547477
MDR Text Key74595118
Report Number1644487-2017-03725
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Replace
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/29/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/05/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/31/2017
Device Model Number304-20
Device Lot Number202579
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/15/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device Age3 YR
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received06/25/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/18/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age5 YR
-
-