|
Catalog Number 0112650 |
Device Problems
Defective Device (2588); Extrusion (2934)
|
Patient Problems
Wound Dehiscence (1154); Pain (1994); Discharge (2225)
|
Event Date 05/31/1996 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Currently, it is unknown to what extent the device may have caused or contributed to the reported event as no specific failure mode or patient injury was alleged.The medical records provided indicate the patient experienced pain, wound dehiscence and extrusion of mesh.Extrusion is listed as a known possible adverse reaction in the instructions-for-use.With the current information available, no definitive conclusion can be made as to the extent that the device may have caused or contributed to any post op complications.If additional event and/or evaluation information is obtained, a follow up mdr will be submitted.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.Not returned to manufacturer.
|
|
Event Description
|
The following is based on a review of medical records: on (b)(6) 1996 - the patient was diagnosed with uterine prolapse, cystocele, rectocele, rectovaginal fistula and mild endometriosis of the pelvic sidewalls, right greater than left.The patient underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy, appendectomy, moschowitz vaginal sling using a bard "marlex" flat mesh, burch urethropexy and a posterior repair.On (b)(6) 1996 - md office exam, the md noted "good support but there was granulation tissue." on (b)(6) 1996 - patient had an md office exam.Md noted mesh in the patient's mid portion of the vaginal cuff.The patient was given estrogen cream.On (b)(6) 1996-- patient had md office exams.It was noted that the patient still had mesh present in the vaginal vault.The patient had a series of cotton sponges placed in her vaginal vault with an enema given methylene blue.The surgeon did not note any blueness on the cotton and therefore the md decided that she did not have a fistula that could be demonstrated.On (b)(6) 1996 - the patient was diagnosed with dehiscence of superior vaginal cuff with protrusion of vaginal mesh (davol flat) secondary to enterocele repair with granulation tissue, possible rectovaginal fistula at superior superficial perineal body and no demonstrable fistula.The patient underwent excision of vaginal mesh (davol flat) and resuturing of the vaginal cuff and minimal perineoplasty.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|