• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES MONUMENT DRIVE SHAFT-MINIMUM 520MM LENGTH-FOR USE WITH RIA; REAMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES MONUMENT DRIVE SHAFT-MINIMUM 520MM LENGTH-FOR USE WITH RIA; REAMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 314.743
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/11/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional device product code is hrx.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.(b)(6).The subject device was received.The investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.A device history record (dhr) review for the reported subject device lot has been requested.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Synthes europe reported an event in the (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that whilst using the reamer/irrigator/aspirator (ria) the drive shaft splintered.A metal fragment from the broken drive shaft got stuck in the tibia which had to be removed as it was blocking the continuation of reaming.The fragment was removed allowing continuation of the reaming.The surgery was prolonged approximately 20 minutes.There was no adverse consequence to the patient.The surgery was successfully completed.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot number 7312608.Supplier: (b)(4).Date of manufacture: 19 aug 2013.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.A manufacturing investigation was performed for the subject device (drive shaft-minimum 520 mm length-for use with ria, part number 314.743, lot number 7312608).The subject device was returned to the manufacturer with the complaint condition stating: during the investigation, no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.A visual inspection under 5x magnification, device history record (dhr) review, and drawing review were performed as part of this investigation.This complaint is confirmed, as the distal tip of the ria is broken off.Although a definitive root cause could not be determined, the complaint condition was most likely caused by force applied to the distal end of the drive shaft, resulting in stresses beyond the failure limit.Other clinical factors such as the patient¿s condition and physical attributes could have impacted the positioning of the instrument, or lateral forces during surgery, that are unable to be replicated in the cq, may have been acting on the instrument.The drive shaft was received with the distal tip, which mates with the reamer head, broken off.The broken portion was not received.The break is located approximately 5.78 to 8.96 mm distal to the distal edge of the drive shaft helix.The helix is intact and in good condition.Additionally, the device also has minor surface wear which does not impact functionality.Replication of the complaint condition is not applicable as the device was received in broken condition.Measurements taken with calipers.The following drawings for the device were reviewed, and no drawing issues or discrepancies were noted.The design is adequate for its intended use and did not contribute to this complaint condition.The complaint condition was most likely caused by force applied to the distal end of the drive shaft resulting in stresses beyond the failure limit.Other clinical factors such as the patient¿s condition and physical attributes could have impacted the positioning of the instrument, or lateral forces during surgery, that are unable to be replicated in the cq, may have been acting on the instrument.The root cause could not be definitively determined as the circumstances at the time of the break are unknown.It is not likely that the design of the device contributed to this complaint.No new, unique or different patient harms were identified as a result of this evaluation.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DRIVE SHAFT-MINIMUM 520MM LENGTH-FOR USE WITH RIA
Type of Device
REAMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES MONUMENT
1051 synthes ave
monument CO 80132
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES MONUMENT
1051 synthes ave
monument CO 80132
Manufacturer Contact
michael cote
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key6553349
MDR Text Key74698975
Report Number1719045-2017-10440
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HTO
UDI-Device Identifier07611819739208
UDI-Public(01)07611819739208(10)7312608
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K042899
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/11/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/09/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number314.743
Device Lot Number7312608
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/08/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/15/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-