• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; SCREW, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; SCREW, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Kim, et al (2016) successful outcome with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for periprosthetic tibial fracture after total knee arthroplasty.Orthopaedics & traumatology: surgery & research 103;263-268.This report is for unknown screw, unknown quantity, unknown lot.Other number: udi: unknown part number, udi is unavailable.The investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn, as no device was returned and no lot number or part number was provided.(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Literature article received.This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following literature article: kim,.Et al (2016) successful outcome with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for periprosthetic tibial fracture after total knee arthroplasty.Orthopaedics & traumatology: surgery & research 103;263-268.Sixteen patients with periprosthetic tibial fracture after total knee arthroplasty (tka) were included.There were 6 type ii and 10 type iii fractures according to the felix classification.Ten patients had fractures in the proximal metaphysis, and 6 in the diaphysis.Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (mipo) technique using locking plates was performed on the medial side in 4 cases, the lateral side in 2 cases, and both in 10 cases.Either pre-shaped locking compression plate - proximal lateral tibia (lcp-plt; synthes, (b)(4)), locking compression plate - medial proximal tibia (lcp-mpt;synthes), or narrow locking compression plate (narrow lcp;synthes) were used.The reason for tka was osteoarthritis in 11 patients, rheumatoid arthritis in 2 patients, osteosarcoma in 2 patients and ankylosis caused by osteomyelitis in 1 patient.The mean age was 62.8 (range, 16¿85 years); there were 13 women and 3 men.The mean interval between tka and periprosthetic fracture was 46.6 months (range, 1¿150 months).Fourteen of 16 fractures achieved union at 17.1 weeks.This is report 2 of 4 for (b)(4).This report is for unknown screw and refers to the following: (b)(6) female- lcp medial locking plate- experienced superficial infection with redness and heat with soft tissue irritation caused by loosened screws at the proximal side due to insufficient stability.-the plate was removed before union to treat the infection.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
SCREW, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
michael cote
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key6559864
MDR Text Key74937312
Report Number2520274-2017-11625
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HWC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/13/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/13/2017
Initial Date FDA Received05/11/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age77 YR
-
-