|
It was reported during an unspecified procedure while using a cxi support catheter, the device was advanced to the common iliac artery (cia) with severely calcified chronic total occlusion (cto) lesion by contralateral approach.A wire guide could pass through the lesion however, the cxi stopped advancing, got stuck and separated.It cannot be determined which wire guide was used when the separation occurred.The separated segment remained in the calcified lesion, but the device portion was retrieved eventually using a snare device.There have been no adverse effects to the patient reported.
|
|
Investigation - evaluation: a review of the complaint history, drawings, dimensional verification, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, quality control , functional testing and visual inspection of the returned device was conducted during the investigation.One used cxi support catheter was returned for evaluation.A portion of the distal tip was noted to be separated from the catheter.An attempt was made to insert an.018 inch wire guide, which was not able to advance through the catheter due to the catheter occlusion with what appeared to be biomaterial.The strain relief was attached and secure.The distal tip was separated distal tip.An.018 inch wire guide was able to be inserted into the portion of the separated distal tip.The returned device met dimensional requirements.A document based investigation evaluation was also performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.Review of device history record shows no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.It should be noted there one additional complaints associated with this lot number.The device is shipped with an instruction for use (ifu) which states: ¿the catheter should not be advanced through and area of resistance unless the source of the resistance is identified by fluoroscopy and the appropriate steps are taken and to reduce or remove the obstruction¿.Based on the information provided, and results of the investigation force being applied during the advancement of the device through the severely calcified lesion (as reported by the physician) may have contributed to the reported separation.A definitive root cause; however, could not conclusively be determined.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.
|