The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a break in the guidewire was confirmed, and the damage appears to be related to use of the device.One powerglide pro deployment system was returned for investigation.The catheter had been removed from the needle and was not returned for investigation.The safety mechanism had been locked over the needle tip.Blood residue was observed in the handle.No portion of the guidewire was protruding from the distal tip of the safety mechanism.The safety mechanism was removed from the needle and the distal tip of the needle was microscopically examined.There was a break in the wire that coincided with the tip of the needle.The distal tip of the wire was not returned for investigation.The fractured end of the wire exhibited necking and a granular tip, which is consistent with a tensile break.The inner edge of the needle bevel exhibited deformation, which is indicative of force between the wire and the needle bevel.No further action is required because the complainant event could not be related to a deficiency in product manufacture or deficiency while under correct product use.A lot history review (lhr) of rebn2178 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|