• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES SELZACH PATIENT SPECIFIC SPLINT ORTHOGNATHIC, FINAL; TEMPLATE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES SELZACH PATIENT SPECIFIC SPLINT ORTHOGNATHIC, FINAL; TEMPLATE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SD900.106
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 04/29/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient age/date of birth and weight are unknown.(b)(4).Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.(b)(6).(b)(4).Part sd980.001, lot me16tuhqul: manufacturing location: (b)(4).Supplier: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: april 19, 2017.No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that the patient had a bilateral posterior open bite two to three (2-3) millimeters.This occurred when doing the mandible movement component of the surgery; it was after plating the mandible using the final splint, as positioning guide, and using the mandible patient specific plates.The surgeon attempted to correct this via several steps.He moved the mandible plates and re-plated; the patient still had a bilateral posterior open-bite.He took the splint out and re-plated; the patient still had a bilateral posterior open-bite.He took the splint out and removed cut the bottom bar off double bars on patient specific mandible plates; this is the step that stopped the posterior open bite.There was a surgical delay to procedure of ninety (90) minutes.There was no adverse event to patient reported.This is report 3 of 3 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Complainant part is no longer expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.A product investigation was completed: complained issue could not be replicated and/or confirmed based on the available information.No pictures and/or x-rays were provided and no material was returned for investigation.Device history record (dhr) reviews were performed for the affected lots, no abnormalities or deviations were detected, which could lead to the complaint failure.No non-conformance reports were marked in the dhr during production.Planning, guide design and production steps that could explain a posterior open bite.Therefore, it is determined that the materialise devices performed as intended.In the planning report sent to the surgeon, an overlap of 0.8 mm was indicated in the posterior maxillary region.Such measurements in the planning report indicate approximate overlaps and potential bony reductions needed in the posterior maxilla that are not guided with the titanium 3d printed guide for midface.As these bony reductions are done free hand by the surgeon, it is possible that the surgeon removed too much bone of the maxilla in this region.This could potentially have led to a slight discrepancy in final position of the maxilla compared to the surgical plan.A shallow final splint was designed for this case as per the surgeon¿s request.Potentially, the surgeon did not fully lock the teeth of the mandible in the teeth impressions of the shallow splint posteriorly.Combined with the potential discrepancy in maxillary position, this could have led to a posterior open bite as indicated by the complainant.This however, cannot be confirmed based on the available information.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PATIENT SPECIFIC SPLINT ORTHOGNATHIC, FINAL
Type of Device
TEMPLATE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES SELZACH
bohnackerweg 5
selzach CH254 5
SZ  CH2545
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES SELZACH
bohnackerweg 5
selzach CH254 5
SZ   CH2545
Manufacturer Contact
michael cote
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key6593612
MDR Text Key76033482
Report Number3000270450-2017-10181
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HWT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/29/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/26/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberSD900.106
Device Lot NumberME16-TUH-QUL_02
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/28/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/19/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-