The evaluation revealed the broken trochanteric nail kit, ti gamma3® ø11x180mm x 125° to be the primary product.No deviations were found during review of the manufacturing and inspection documents (dhr).The nail was documented as faultless prior to distribution.An investigation of the broken nail was not possible because it was not available.Therefore, the evaluation is based only on the given information.The customer reported that the patient fell at home and visited the surgeon due to hip pain; an x-ray evaluation revealed that the implanted nail was broken.Most likely the nail got broken caused by a single overload due to the patient¿s fall.The review of the dhr shows no manufacturing or material issues, therefore the case is attributed to the patient.Overloads due to fall can lead to implant breakages and are listed as warning in the ifu.A more precise evaluation was not possible due to missing product and missing information.Review of complaint history, capa databases, labelling and risk analysis did not identify any discrepancies.There are no open actions in place related to the reported event for the subject product(s).No non-conformity was identified.
|