| Catalog Number |
PXSLIMSTR |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance (2578)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
04/27/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the abdominal aortic artery (aaa) using a px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim).During the procedure, while attempting to advance the px slim through a non-penumbra microcatheter, the physician encountered resistance at the hub of the microcatheter.Therefore, the px slim was removed and the embolization was successfully completed using a new microcatheter and additional coils.Thereafter, the procedure shifted to a stent-grafting and was completed without any issues.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Results: the px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim) was kinked approximately 17.0, 78.0, 82.0, and 115.0 cm from the hub.The outer diameter (od) of the px slim was measured and found to be within specification.During functional analysis, a stainless steel mandrel was advanced through the px slim, and resistance was encountered upon advancing through the kinked regions.The px slim was then inserted into a demonstration penumbra system 3max reperfusion catheter (3max) and extreme resistance was experienced upon advancing the kinked regions of the px slim through the 3max.The kinked region of the px slim located 17.0 cm from the hub could not advance through the hub of the 3max.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that it was kinked in multiple locations.This damage may have occurred due to forceful handling of the px slim during preparation for use.The kinked regions likely contributed to the resistance experienced during the procedure, and did cause resistance when advancing the px slim through a demonstration 3max.The non-penumbra catheter mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|