| Model Number |
1365-61-000 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Corroded (1131); Degraded (1153); Naturally Worn (2988); Noise, Audible (3273)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Host-Tissue Reaction (1297); Fatigue (1849); Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Inflammation (1932); Necrosis (1971); Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330); Osteolysis (2377); Metal Related Pathology (4530); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
|
| Date of Event |
03/29/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This complaint is still under investigation.Depuy will notify the fda of the results of this investigation once it has been completed.Udi: unavailable.This complaint is the subject of litigation or a legal claim and currently complete product detail is not available at this time.A follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On may 17, 2017: litigation received.Litigation alleges pain, discomfort, clicking noise, development of pseudotumor and metallosis.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Update aug 17, 2017: legal medical records received.In addition to what was previously alleged, pfs alleges fatigue and high cobalt levels.After review of the medical records for mdr reportability, it was stated that the patient was revised to address abnormal local tissue response to metal.Revision notes reported necrosis, brownish red fluid, very large necrotic edematous appearing extension of the pseudocapsule consistent with an abnormal local tissue response to metal, abnormal muscle measures approximately 5 or 6 mm, gross black corrosion on either side of the head and neck taper, some lysis.Pathologist reports periarticular tissue with a fibrinoid debris histiolytic response with a mild acute inflammation.Part and lot information were provided.This complaint was updated on aug 29, 2017.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Udi: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Ppf alleges metal wear.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : no device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.H10 additional narrative: added: h6 (device).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Ppf and pfs has no new allegation.After review of medical records patient was revised due to failed left total hip replacement with abnormal local tissue response to metal.During dissecting through the deep fascia a gross necrosis found within the substance of the gluteus maximus.A fluid appears brownish red and tissues appeared necrotic in this region.There was gross black corrosion products on either side of the head.Doi: (b)(6) 2008 dor: (b)(6) 2017 (left hip).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthese joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthese joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information received indicated that the section of the medical records that was reviewed mentioned that a revision procedure also took place on (b)(6) 2017 due to extensive abnormal local tissue response with pseudotumor tissue destruction.The head and liner were revised along with extensive irrigation and debridement.Revision operative notes (b)(6) 2017 indicate the patient received a left total hip revision due to delay wound healing and infection.Upon entering the joint necrotic tissue, inflamed tissue, and purulent fluid was encountered and removed.Osteolysis was noted on the acetabular side and was debrided.The stem was noted to have a small amount of corrosion.All implants were removed and prostalac was placed for infection treatment.The surgery was completed without indication of complication by the surgeon.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : the device associated with this complaint was not returned.Photo evidence and x-rays provided were reviewed and found no visible implant issue.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot : the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation mre was not performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|