The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer, at this time, for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) of ngas2057 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.Device not returned, at this time.
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a leaking balloon bolster was confirmed and the cause appeared to be use-related.The product returned for evaluation was one 24fr tri-funnel replacement gastrostomy feeding device.The sample appeared free of obvious usage residues and the balloon bolster was positioned near the proximal end of the device.The balloon bolster was not inflated.An attempt to fill the balloon with water using a 12ml syringe revealed the balloon fill lumen to be patent; however, two circumferentially opposite leaks were observed in the balloon near the proximal end.Microscopic inspection of the leak sites revealed circumferentially opposite damage.The damage comprised circumferentially aligned splits.The split surfaces were sharply defined and coarsely striated.The splits in the balloon bolster exhibited characteristics consistent with damage caused by contact with a metallic grasping instrument such as forceps or hemostats.The relative positions of the splits indicated that the damage was caused by manipulation of the sample with such an instrument.The product ifu states ¿do not grasp the catheter with any instrument that might damage the catheter.¿.
|