|
A review of the complaint history, drawings, dimensional verification, device history record, documentation, manufacturing instructions, quality control and visual inspection of the returned device was conducted during the investigation.The complaint dilator was returned for evaluation; the sheath was not returned.Visual inspection revealed that the proximal fitting had separated from the shaft of the dilator.No other notable damage was observed.The flare size (diameter) was measured using calipers and was found to be within specification.Also, the inner diameter of the connector cap was measured using pin gauges, and was found to be within specification.Review of device history record shows no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.This complaint is the third reported complaint associated to the complaint lot.Based on the provided information and results of the investigation, a definitive root cause cannot conclusively be determined.Measures have been previously initiated to address this issue.The appropriate personnel will be notified and monitoring for similar complaints will continue.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|