• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM CORPORATION CDI BLOOD PARAMETER MONITORING SYSTEM 500; MONITOR, BLOOD-GAS, ON-LINE, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS-CDI BPM SYSTEM 500

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM CORPORATION CDI BLOOD PARAMETER MONITORING SYSTEM 500; MONITOR, BLOOD-GAS, ON-LINE, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS-CDI BPM SYSTEM 500 Back to Search Results
Model Number 500AHCT
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation is in progress, but not yet concluded.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the device was reporting wrong arterial numbers.As a result, an alternate device was employed.The surgical procedure was completed successfully.There was no blood loss nor adverse consequences to the patient.Diligence attempts were made for the remaining surgery related questions but were unsuccessful.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
During laboratory analysis, the product surveillance technician (pst) evaluated the blood parameter monitor (bpm) for accuracy.No specific information was communicated by the customer as to which arterial value or values were incorrect.Reference and data intensity values were acceptable and stable, gas calibrations were successfully performed, and in-vivo adjustments demonstrated the ability to fine-tune onscreen information.The temperature reported by the bpm differs from another bpm by approximately one degree celsius (c) at 15 and at 35 degrees c.If additional information becomes available on this complaint that would alter the facts and/or conclusion, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint was confirmed.The difference in temperature noted in the laboratory analysis is larger than is typical based on temperature accuracy data indicated in operator¿s manual, which indicates a mean temperature difference of -0.07 degrees and a standard deviation of 0.22 based on in-house sampling of blood paramater (bpm) monitors.This would result in inaccurate values for the other bpm parameters, given the relationship of temperature into the algorithms.Per the manufacturer's central engineering, the hematocrit saturation module (h/sat) cannot be tested on the blood loop due to a broken h/sat clip.The product will be sent to service to be brought to manufacturer¿s specifications before being returned to the customer.If additional information becomes available on this complaint that would alter the facts and/or conclusion, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CDI BLOOD PARAMETER MONITORING SYSTEM 500
Type of Device
MONITOR, BLOOD-GAS, ON-LINE, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS-CDI BPM SYSTEM 500
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM CORPORATION
6200 jackson road
ann arbor MI 48103
Manufacturer Contact
katie hoyt
6200 jackson road
ann arbor, MI 48103
7346634145
MDR Report Key6681206
MDR Text Key79031092
Report Number1828100-2017-00291
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K133658
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/09/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number500AHCT
Device Catalogue Number500AHCT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/20/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/07/2017
Initial Date FDA Received06/30/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/04/2017
10/05/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/28/2017
10/09/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/26/2001
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-