| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Inflammation (1932)
|
| Date of Event |
06/10/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A follow-up report will be submitted upon receipt of additional information or completion of the investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
International customer reported that a patient received a vital-port detached silicone catheter titanium infusion port on an unspecified date.The device was implanted in the patients right arm.The patient developed an "intolerance reaction with a visible swelling " at an unspecified time following implant of the device.The swelling is noted along the subcutaneous course of the catheter and at the port implant site.There is no report of infection.The vital-port detached silicone catheter titanium infusion port was explanted and replaced with an unspecified peripherally inserted central catheter (picc) line.No further event or patient information was provided.Other than the reported swelling in the arm, no other information was reported regarding the patient's condition.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation summary: the affect product was returned for evaluation and the event report was confirmed.The vital port was returned unassembled, along with the catheter lock and a length of catheter measuring approximately 45.5 cm.The visual inspection revealed there were no signs of holes or damage to the catheter when observed under magnification.The suture holes were not utilized.The instructions for use was reviewed which states under port suturing and site closure: "three sutures, with at least one at each end of the port, are recommended".A product evaluation was performed which showed the suture holes were not utilized during this case, and there was only one needle stick observed in the septum.Neither the port or the catheter were occluded.The customer supplied photos/images and there is evidence of redness of the implant area.The device history record was also reviewed for the lot number of the device, and no signs were found to indicate that a nonconforming product was released to the field.This device lot has not been previously reported on a complaint.A quality engineering risk assessment concluded that no risk reduction is necessary.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
There has been no additional information received regarding the event.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|