| Catalog Number |
610131 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Blood Loss (2597); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
06/06/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The actual device has been returned to the manufacturing facility for evaluation.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.For this reason, (b)(4)has been referenced in the conclusions section of evaluation codes.A review of the device history record of the product code/lot# combination was conducted with no relevant findings.A search of the complaint file did not find any other report with the involved product code/lot# combination.The user facility reported similar events from the same product code/lot number combination.See mdr 3013394970-2017-00151.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The user facility reported the anchor not setting on the angio-seal device during a procedure.The following information was provided by the user facility: this was a bilateral iliac case with femoral access both on the left side; on the left side one device was kinked upon insertion and it is available to be returned for evaluation; the second device was inserted and proper deployment steps were followed, but the anchor did not set and the device failed; the tech cut the string and the absorbable components were left inside the patient; at the initial ultrasound no blockages from the anchor were detected and a pulse was found on the foot; the reason she thought the anchor detached was because the seal failed; there is no evidence that the anchor actually did detach; the collagen was tamped down; pressure had to be held to stop the bleeding; they were still concerned that the anchor was in the patient; there was no occlusion caused by the failed device; the anchor not setting was after the first device bent on insertion on the left side; there were no issues reported for the outcome of the procedure; the blood loss was less than 250 cc's; and post procedure the patient had no issues.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted as follow up no.1 to provide the device evaluation and to correct which was inadvertently left unmarked, other serious has been marked.Returned in one ziploc bag was an 8fr angio-seal vip device.The carrier tube assembly was returned mated with a hemostatic sheath and had remnants of dried body fluids present.The device cap of was located in the rear lock position which is consistent with successful deployment of the device.In addition to the mated carrier tube and hemostatic sheath, an arteriotomy locator was returned mated with a third hemostatic sheath.The returned device had the anchor detached from the exposed length of the suture.There appeared to be a cut of the suture distal to the clear shrink-wrap marker.Microscopic photographs of the suture end were analyzed.Clean cuts with no fraying were noted at the distal tip of the suture.This indicates that a sharp edge like a pair of surgical scissors may have been used to cut the suture thus releasing the collagen and the anchor.This investigation was hindered by the incomplete return device that was missing the collagen and anchor.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted as follow up no.2 to provide the completed investigation results.There is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.The exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based on the available information.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|