(b)(4).(b)(6).This device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.During repair, it was determined that the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to wear from normal use and servicing.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|
It was reported from (b)(6) that during service and evaluation, it was observed that the battery handpiece device gear seized, jammed and moved heavy and the device could not be operated.It was further determined that the device failed the following pre-tests: check for leakage, check the saw blade coupling and check function of all modes.It was noted in the service order that the device was spoiled.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.The exact date of this event was unknown.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|