| Catalog Number |
AR-8643-55 |
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Information (3190)
|
| Date of Event |
04/28/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Patient demographics (age at time of event, date of birth, gender, weight) were requested but not provided.No further patient information was provided at the time of this report or made available in response to follow-up communication.No additional adverse consequences have been reported from this event.This device is used for treatment.This is one of two submissions from the same case.The other is (b)(4).Lot number was not provided so device history record review cannot be performed.The device was requested for evaluation but remained in the patient therefore the complainant's event could not be verified.Another non-arthrex device was also used in the procedure.Based on the information provided, a definitive cause for the post-operative infection could not be determined.The most likely cause for this type of event is a nosocomial source or patient non-compliance with post-op wound care directions.This is the first complaint of this type for this part/lot combination.The potential cause(s) of this event will be communicated to the event reporter.If additional relevant information is received, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a subtalar fusion case the following items were implanted: arthrocell, 2.5cc ((b)(4)), 6.5x80mm headless compress screw ((b)(4)) and 4.3x55mm headless compression screw ((b)(4)).The patient has since developed an infection at the site.A culture has been done and came up negative.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Patient demographics (age at time of event, date of birth, gender, weight) were requested but not provided.No further patient information was provided at the time of this report or made available in response to follow-up communication.No additional adverse consequences have been reported from this event.This device is used for treatment.This is one of two follow up submissions from the same case.The other is (b)(4).Lot number was not provided so device history record review cannot be performed.The device was requested for evaluation but remained in the patient therefore the complainant's event could not be verified.Another non-arthrex device was also used in the procedure.Based on the information provided, a definitive cause for the post-operative infection could not be determined.The most likely cause for this type of event is a nosocomial source or patient non-compliance with post-op wound care directions.This is the first complaint of this type for this part/lot combination.The potential cause(s) of this event will be communicated to the event reporter.If additional relevant information is received, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a subtalar fusion case the following items were implanted: arthrocell, 2.5cc (line 198894), 6.5x80mm headless compress screw (line 198895) and 4.3x55mm headless compression screw (line 198896).The patient has since developed an infection at the site.A culture has been done and came up negative.Follow up investigation: it was reported that the patient developed draining and odor from the surgical wound.On (b)(6) 2017 the patient was admitted to the hospital for implant removal, wound care, iv antibiotics and picc line for outpatient iv antibiotics.The patient's culture was positive for staphylococcus aureus.The patient will continue iv antibiotic via picc line for a minimum of 6 weeks due to done involvement.No further surgery is indicated at this time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No further patient information was provided at the time of this report or made available in response to follow-up communication.No additional adverse consequences have been reported from this event.This device is used for treatment.This is one of two follow up submissions from the same case.The other is (b)(4).Lot number was not provided so device history record review cannot be performed.The device was requested for evaluation but the device was discarded by facility therefore the complainant's event could not be verified.Another non-arthrex device was also used in the procedure.Based on the information provided, a definitive cause for the post-operative infection could not be determined.The most likely cause for this type of event is a nosocomial source or patient non-compliance with post-op wound care directions.This is the first complaint of this type for this part/lot combination.The potential cause(s) of this event will be communicated to the event reporter.If additional relevant information is received, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a subtalar fusion case the following items were implanted: arthrocell, 2.5cc ((b)(4)), 6.5x80mm headless compress screw ((b)(4)) and 4.3x55mm headless compression screw ((b)(4)).The patient has since developed an infection at the site.A culture has been done and came up negative.Follow up investigation: it was reported that the patient developed draining and odor from the surgical wound.On (b)(6) 2017 the patient was admitted to the hospital for implant removal, wound care, iv antibiotics and picc line for outpatient iv antibiotics.The patient's culture was positive for staphylococcus aureus.The patient will continue iv antibiotic via picc line for a minimum of 6 weeks due to bone involvement.No further surgery is indicated at this time.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|