|
Pma/510(k): preamendment.Investigation ¿ evaluation: a review of the complaint history, device history record, documentation, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, quality control, trends, dimensional verification, and visual inspection of the returned device was conducted during the investigation.One opened, used catheter was returned with biomatter present.It was confirmed that the hub separated from the catheter.The flare of the catheter shaft and the connector cap end hole were measure with calipers and pin gauge checkers, respectively.Both dimensions were found to be manufactured within specification.A visual examination found there to be no obvious damage to the hub or the catheter shaft that may have led to the separation.A review of the set lot number (7546370) and the catheter subassembly work order (b)(4) shows no nonconformances during the manufacturing process.A review of the manufacturer's database found this to be the only complaint associated with lot number 7546370 and catheter subassembly work order (b)(4).Design and manufacturing documents in place at the time of manufacture were reviewed.It was found that the device aspects in question were visually inspected, and no notable gaps in production or processing controls were noted.The risk specification for this product include the failure mode of catheter shaft separation from the hub.Based on the information provided and the results of our investigation; a definitive root cause could not be determined.This failure mode is being escalated per internal processes.We have notified the appropriate personnel and will continue to monitor for similar complaints.As a preventive measure, internal personnel were retrained to internal quality control inspection and manufacturing procedures as well as advised of the risks associated with hub failure for this device.In addition the users at this facility were retrained on use of this device.
|