| Catalog Number |
RBY2C0305 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance (2578)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
06/23/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly.The embolization coil windings were offset along the length of the coil.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the embolization coil windings were offset.This type of damage likely occurs due to improper handling during use.If the introducer sheath is not properly seated inside the hub of the microcatheter prior to advancement, damage such as this may occur.The rotating hemostatic valve (rhv) not being used during the procedure may have contributed to the reported issue.The non-penumbra microcatheter mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using ruby coils.During the procedure, the physician was unable to advance the ruby coil fully through the introducer sheath and into the non-penumbra microcatheter; therefore, the ruby coil was removed.The procedure was completed using additional ruby coils and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Please note that the following section was incorrectly reported on the initial mfr report and is being corrected on this follow-up #01 mfr report: 1.Device manufacture date.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|