Catalog Number 111645 |
Device Problems
Mechanical Problem (1384); Use of Device Problem (1670)
|
Patient Problems
Discomfort (2330); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 06/29/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2017 a pfj was conducted with the mako at (b)(6).At the beginning of the case i notified staff that all bone pins and checkpoints were to be included in the count.During the surgery i notified the surgeon to use a ronguer to remove the checkpoint as he was removing the bone pins.At the end of the case i asked if the count was correct and was told that it was correct by the nursing staff.The following day on (b)(6) 2017 the recon rep notified me that a femur checkpoint was found in a post op x-ray inside the patient.On (b)(6) 2017 the surgeon performed an additional procedure opening the incision to remove the checkpoint.The checkpoint was removed and an additional x-ray was taken.It showed complete removal of the checkpoint.Case type: mako pfj.Application pka.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reported event: the surgeon left the femoral checkpoint in the patient and additional surgery was performed to remove the femoral checkpoint.Device evaluation and results: the checkpoint was not returned.The issue in this complaint was not a product defect but a use error.Device history review: review of the device history record shows no non-conformances for the parts.Complaint history review: a review of complaints within the trackwise database for p/n 111645 for p/n 111645 show one other complaint related to the failure in this investigation.The pr is (b)(4).Conclusion: the surgeon left the checkpoints in the patient even with the on-screen warning and user guide warnings.There were no device issues.No additional investigation is required.Corrective action/preventive action: no action is required at this time as there is no indication to suggest a product non-conformity or unanticipated hazard.The device was not returned for evaluation.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2017 a pfj was conducted with the mako at (b)(6) hospital in (b)(6).At the beginning of the case i notified staff that all bone pins and checkpoints were to be included in the count.During the surgery i notified the surgeon to use a rongeur to remove the checkpoint as he was removing the bone pins.At the end of the case i asked if the count was correct and was told that it was correct by the nursing staff.The following day on (b)(6) 2017 the recon rep notified me that a femur checkpoint was found in a post op x-ray inside the patient.On (b)(6) 2017 the surgeon performed an additional procedure opening the incision to remove the checkpoint.The checkpoint was removed and an additional x-ray was taken.It showed complete removal of the checkpoint.Case type: mako pfj.Update 07/10/2017: application pka.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|