|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Evaluation summary: visual inspections were performed on the returned device.The tip detachment was confirmed.In this case, it may be possible that the distal end of the introducer sheath was angled or bent such that during withdrawal, the supera tip caught on the edge of the sheath and separated; however, this could not be confirmed.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.The investigation was unable to determine a cause for the reported the tip detachment.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|