The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.Aa lot history review (lhr) of gfan1657 showed one other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.The complaints for this lot number (gfan1657) have been reported from the same (b)(4) facility.
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of poor drainage was confirmed due to kinks that were observed in the catheter, which appear to have developed during use.One 6fr locking pigtail drainage catheter was returned for investigation.A 2cm section of residue was observed on the catheter 10cm from the distal end of the rubber seal, which confirms that the catheter was used.A kink was observed in the catheter at the proximal hole through which the string passes and at a point 2.3cm proximal to this hole.A microscopic examination revealed creases in the tubing where the catheter was kinked.A functional test confirmed that when the catheter was kinked, fluid flow through the catheter was affected.The catheter may have been placed in a location that caused the tubing to kink.
|