|
On 27 july 2017 the packaging and washing manager performed a preliminary investigation based on the available picture and commented as follows: on the basis of the picture provided, we could infer that the debris found inside the packaging had not detached from the implant.On the basis of our experience, this kind of screws could not release similar impurities, because after their manufacturing they undergo to a sandblast process that eliminates almost all the overburden.Moreover, the screws are also washed twice (by ultrasonics and bio-wash).In order to deeply investigate the issue, we should wait the fragments return.In the meanwhile, i can reasonably exclude that the contamination could have come from the packaging itself, as in some cases in the past it happened that residue were found in packaging, but they were always plastic parts (consistent with the packaging material).Batch review performed on 25 july 2017.Lot 168793: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 13 february 2017.Expiration date: 2022-02-01.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, (b)(4) items of the same lot have been already sold without any similar reported event.
|
|
On (b)(6) 2017 the packaging and washing manager performed a visual inspection of the retrieved item and commented as follows: the screw surface didn't show any irregularity to be linked to the detachment of the two debris in object, so it could be reasonably confirmed what already hypotesized in the preliminary investigation.Moreover, since (b)(6) 2013, this is the only one case reported for this specific issue, so it could be concluded that it is an isolated case and there is no reason to suspect that the debris could have been generated by any manufacturing process failure.
|