| Catalog Number |
RBYPOD5 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
07/11/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was fractured approximately 100.5 cm from the proximal end.The embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly with the constraint sphere intact and the pull wire was retracted out of the distal detachment tip (ddt).Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the pod5¿s pusher assembly was fractured.This type of damage typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the device is forcefully mishandled during use, the pusher assembly may become kinked.Upon retraction of the kinked pusher assembly against resistance, the kink damage may develop into a fracture.The fractured pusher assembly likely contributed to the pull wire being retracted out of the ddt and allowing the embolization coil to detach from its pusher assembly.The lantern and introducer sheath mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using pod5s.During the procedure, the physician advanced a pod5 through the lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern) and into the vessel; however the pod5 would not take its shape within the vessel.The pod5 was therefore removed, and then it unintentionally detached outside of the patient¿s body as it was retracted into its introducer sheath.The procedure was therefore completed using four ruby coils and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Correction: corrected ¿returned to manufacturer on¿ to 7/13/2017.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|