|
An endurant ii stent graft system was implanted in the patient for the endovascular treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm.The patient had extremely tortuous anatomy.Approximately three years and ten months post index procedure a ct revealed that there was a distal type i endoleak on the right ips lateral limb of the endurant ii stent graft bifurcate.Additionally, it was observed that there was an inadequate amount of stent graft seal, by the left contralateral endurant ii limb, in the common iliac artery that was at risk of developing a distal type i endoleak.Both stent graft limbs were observed to have migrated.The physician elected to schedule the patient to have bilateral limb extensions implanted.Per the physician, the cause of the event was due to undersizing.No additional clinical sequelae were reported and the patient is being monitored by their physician.
|
|
Additional information received reported that during the intervention procedure, the angiogram showed no endoleak within the aneurysm sac but the previous ct was definitive that one was present and it was determined that the limbs of the existing stent graft needed to be extended.The physician elected to place a limb via the right femoral artery into the previously implanted bifurcate stent graft.The physician implanted an endurant ii stent graft limb within the ipsilateral limb of the endurant ii stent graft bifurcate with adequate overlap and extended down to the right hypogastric artery.The physician then implanted an endurant stent graft limb extension via the left femoral artery and extended distally to near the left hypogastric artery.A reliant balloon was inflated throughout the limb extension.A final angiogram showed no visible endoleak with increased coverage of the common iliac arteries.Evaluation summary: the exact cause of the bilateral stent graft limb migration, leading to the distal type i endoleak, could not be determined from the films provided.However, it appears likely that this was anatomy related.Films during implant and earlier follow-up were not provided for review and comparison, and the position of the limbs immediately post-implant is unknown.Pre-implant ct¿s revealed that the proximal neck was severely tortuous and conical ¿ shaped.The infrarenal angulation measured ~75deg l-r and 65 deg a-p; relative to the distal aorta.The right common iliac artery diameter ranged from 16 ¿ 14mm along the 4cm length, and the left common iliac diameter ranged from 20 ¿ 17 ¿ 13mm along the 4cm length vessel.Review of ct¿s 45 months post-implant showed that the bifurcate proximal aortic body was angulated ~65deg lt-rt and 80 deg a-p; relative to the iliac limbs and distal aorta.The maximum diameter aaa measured 6cm, and both distal limbs were seen having pulled out of their common iliacs and were positioned within the distal sac.The distal end of the bifurcate ipsi/right limb measured ~17mm od, and was ~4cm above the distal aorta with a distal type i endo leak.The contra/left limb was ~10mm above the origin of the left common iliac artery; the distal od of the left limb was 22mm.Although no clear endoleak was seen on the left side, it is possible that the aaa was being pressurized via the marginal left iliac distal seal.The common iliac arteries were mildly tortuous, and ranged in diameter from 22 ¿ 17 ¿ 14mm on the right side, and 21 ¿ 19 ¿ 18mm on the left.It appears likely that disease progression (iliac artery dilatation), and bilateral iliac limb angulation due to implanting in the tortuous aorta with possible morphology changes, all may have contributed to the limb migration.The reported device undersizing may have also contributed.Films during the intervention with bilateral distal limbs which resolved the migration and endoleak were not returned.
|