• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT EMBOSHIELD NAV6 EMBOLIC PROTECTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT EMBOSHIELD NAV6 EMBOLIC PROTECTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 22438-19
Device Problems Difficult to Insert (1316); Kinked (1339); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/20/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent a peripheral procedure to treat a target lesion in the heavily calcified and heavily tortuous popliteal artery.The emboshield nav6 embolic protection device was advanced to the target site and deployed without difficulty.After use, the emboshield retrieval catheter was advanced with difficulty to the filter and the shaft kinked.The filter was noted to be about 70% full.Because the filter was full of debris and the anatomy was tortuous, the filter could not be pulled into the retrieval catheter.The filter, retrieval catheter and guide wire were removed from the anatomy as a single unit without difficulty.There was no reported adverse patient sequela or a clinically significant delay in procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Visual and functional inspections were performed on the returned device.The reported difficulty retrieving the filter was not able to be confirmed due to the condition of the returned device.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported revealed no other similar incidents.The emboshield nav6 embolic protection system electronic instructions for use states: the system is indicated for use during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting procedures in saphenous vein grafts and carotid arteries.The reported difficulties appear to be due to a large embolic load and there is no indication that the off-label use caused or contributed to the difficulties.The investigation determined that the reported difficulties are due to case circumstances and there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EMBOSHIELD NAV6 EMBOLIC PROTECTION SYSTEM
Type of Device
EMBOLIC PROTECTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key6790359
MDR Text Key82661319
Report Number2024168-2017-06647
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NTE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
PMA/PMN Number
K090665
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/18/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/11/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2019
Device Catalogue Number22438-19
Device Lot Number6122161
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/28/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/16/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/01/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age73 YR
Patient Weight74
-
-