• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAQUET SAS LUCEA 40; LIGHT, SURGICAL, CEILING MOUNTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAQUET SAS LUCEA 40; LIGHT, SURGICAL, CEILING MOUNTED Back to Search Results
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Component Falling (1105)
Patient Problem Injury (2348)
Event Date 07/17/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information will be provided after investigation result.
 
Event Description
On the (b)(4) maquest (b)(4) became aware of an incident with lucea 40 device.It was stated that the cover of the light fell of and hit the patient.There was no injury reported.No furhter information was provided so far.The issue is being investigaed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The issue is stll being investigated by manufacturing site.
 
Event Description
Manufacturer reference number # (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Manufacturer reference number (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The issue is still being investigated by manufacturing site.
 
Event Description
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Getinge usa sales, llc (importer) is submitting this report on behalf of the legal manufacturer of the device maquet sas, (b)(4).Maquet sas became aware of an incident with surgical light lucea device.It was stated that the cover of the light fell off and made a contact with the patient during procedure.There was no injury reported.It was established that when the event occurred, the light-head did not meet its specification and it contributed to the event.At the time when the event occurred the device was being used for the patient treatment.During the investigation it was found that there is no apparent trend and that the reported scenario has never lead to serious injury or worse.The manufacturer has performed an investigation for that case.Unfortunately, we did not receive the information about cleaning products used to clean the device.According to the part evaluation, our product knowledge and based on the previous complaint and on internal tests (cre 12-085), only unexpected use or the use of incompatible cleaning products or wrong cleaning protocol appears likely to damage the device as reported in the complaint.To prevent any other similar case, maquet sas recommends in the lucea 40 user manual 01711en ed.03 how to clean the device.What is more, it is recommended by maquet to daily check the device for chipped paint, impact marks and any other damage.We believe that if the manufacturer recommendation in the ifu would have been followed the incident would have been avoided.Given the circumstances and the fact that there is no apparent trend in complaints we shall continue to monitor for any further events of this nature and do not propose any further action at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUCEA 40
Type of Device
LIGHT, SURGICAL, CEILING MOUNTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAQUET SAS
orléans cedex 2
FR 
Manufacturer (Section G)
FREDERIC LELEU - MAQUET SAS
parc de limère
avenue de la pomme de pi
orléans cedex 2 45074
FR   45074
Manufacturer Contact
parc de limère
avenue de la pomme de pi
orléans cedex 2 45074
0332382587
MDR Report Key6804001
MDR Text Key83259355
Report Number9710055-2017-00052
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FSY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/08/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device Age YR
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/17/2017
Initial Date FDA Received08/18/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/17/2017
07/17/2017
07/17/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/29/2018
03/20/2018
05/08/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-