|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.Device not yet returned.
|
|
Facility reported to the sales rep that the physician was implanting the device and cut off the y-port and left the stylet inside the catheter.The physician and the nurse stated the stylet and the catheter is the same color, if it were a different color, physician and nurse would have detected the sytlet more easily.
|
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint that the stylet was cut and left in the catheter was considered use related.Although no physical sample was returned for investigation, the reported event was determined to be associated with misuse of the device and not following the instructions outlined in the ifu.It was reported that the complainant cut off the y-port and left the stylet inside the catheter.The ifu contains three possible placement techniques (i.E.Antegrade tunnel insertion procedure, retrograde tunnel insertion procedure, over the wire insertion procedure).The ifu states, "remove stylet from catheter." in the case of antegrade and retrograde tunnel insertion procedure and "remove the guidewire and stylet from the catheter as a unit." for the over the wire insertion procedure.After stylet removal, the subsequent step in the ifu states, "cut catheter below y-connector".Based on the reported event, no manufacturing issues were suspect in the affected device.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
|
|
Facility reported to the sales rep that the physician was implanting the device and cut off the y-port and left the stylet inside the catheter.The physician and the nurse stated the stylet and the catheter is the same color, if it were a different color, physician and nurse would have detected the sytlet more easily.
|