• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 106
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Fatigue (1849); Cognitive Changes (2551); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 07/11/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Report received that a patient experienced hypersomnolence and fatigue shortly after initial vns implant.The patient was reportedly very active prior to vns, but after therapy, he became unlike himself and chose to sleep if there were no activities to do.The patient's physician also reported that the patient might have a defect in his serotonin pathway which caused the vns to affect his sleep.The patient was later seen to be in a catatonic state.The physician reportedly disabled normal mode stimulation but kept the magnet mode feature on.She speculated that the change in behavior could be due to forced normalization.Further information was received from the physician that the patient presented with delirium and rigidity while appearing catatonic.She reported that she was looking into the possibility of a neuromuscular problem related to the general anesthetic used in vns surgery.The normal mode remained off.System diagnostics were not provided and no other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Further information was received that the vns was turned back on.The patient returned to the clinic and was reportedly hallucinating and presented with a slight elevation of cpk.The physician reported that this might have been due to forced normalization which was previously speculated to be contributing to the patient's earlier behavior.The device was turned back off and the patient was prescribed a low dose antipsychotic.No further information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Further information was received that the patient has continued to experience psychosis issues while the vns remained off.It was reported that the patient was seizure-free with vns and remained seizure-free with the vns turned off.Because of this, the physician no longer believed the psychosis was vns-related, although it was not known what caused the psychotic issues.No further relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Further information was received that the physician was unable to draw a conclusion between the patient's presentation of muscle spasms and fatigue/hypersomnolence and the finding of the patient's underlying psychotic issues.The physician indicated they were likely separate events.No further relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Information was received the patient was being explanted at the family's request due to the behavior changes (being sedate) that he experienced while stimulation was on.Conversely, the doctor indicated that the behavior was better.Later information was received that the patient had decreased food intake at even low settings.It was reported that the high cpk levels that occurred just after vns implant and the second time the vns was turned on; however the cpk levels did not elevate when the vns was turned on a third time.It was noted that the cpk levels were suspected to be related to the anesthesia.No further relevant information has been received to date.No known surgical intervention has occurred to date.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient's generator and lead was explanted.The physician noted that the high cpk caused by neuroleptic malignant syndrome from anesthesia was ruled out.The explanted generator and lead were received for analysis, but analysis has not completed to date.No further relevant information has been received to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Product analysis was completed on the returned lead.Note that a significant portion of the lead (including the electrode array) was not returned for analysis, so an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.No discontinuities were identified within the returned lead portion.Other than typical wear and explant related observations, no anomalies were identified in the returned lead portion.No further relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Product analysis was completed on the returned generator.The device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the device was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.The device showed signs of variation in the output signal every 24 hours as expected at the settings programmed and demonstrated the expected level of output current.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the device performed according to functional specifications.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 106
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
MDR Report Key6805431
MDR Text Key83091901
Report Number1644487-2017-04322
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/04/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/18/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/25/2019
Device Model Number106
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/30/2021
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received06/09/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age13 YR
-
-