• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 07/25/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr? na.Device evaluation is not necessary as reported event(s) are not related to the functionality or delivery of therapy of the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was going for a vns explant due to the device being uncomfortable for patient and not working.Per a battery life calculation, the device would have reached eos prior to 2010.Therefore the device not working is likely due to battery depletion.The nurse mentioned that the patient had the surgery due to discomfort.Information regarding location of the discomfort and the onset of pain is unknown.The nurse mentioned that the surgery was done because patient requested it.Device evaluation is not necessary as reported event(s) are not related to the functionality or delivery of therapy of the device.
 
Event Description
Further information was received that the lead was also explanted when the generator was explanted.No further relevant information has been received to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The initial mdr indicated that device evaluation was not necessary as reported event(s) were not related to the functionality or delivery of therapy of the device.After the lead was returned and analyzed, a malfunction was found.This lead malfunction may have contributed the reported event as the cause of the reported event was not determined.Therefore, adverse event or product problem, corrected data: follow-up report #1 inadvertently did not include product problem suspect medical device, corrected data: follow-up report #1 inadvertently did not change the suspect device to the lead from the generator.Device code-event problem codes , corrected data: follow-up report #1 inadvertently did not include 1250, fluid leaks as a code.Type of reportable event, corrected data: follow-up report #1 inadvertently did not select 'malfunction' if follow-up what type?, corrected data: follow-up report #1 inadvertently did not select "device evaluation" device evaluated by mfr?, corrected data: follow-up report #1 inadvertently did not select "yes".
 
Event Description
Further information was received that product analysis was completed on the generator.Other than typical explant procedure related observations, no surface abnormalities were noted on the generator.An open can measurement of the battery voltage determined that the battery was depleted.The generator was unable to be interrogated due to this depleted battery condition.The generator performed according to functional specifications.Product analysis was also completed on the returned lead.A section of the lead assembly was returned for analysis in one piece, but the lead's electrodes were not returned for evaluation.Set screw marks were seen on the connector pin providing evidence that proper contact between the set screw and the connector pin existed at least once.Abrasions were noted on the connector boot.Abrasions were noted on the outer silicone tubing at multiple locations.The outer silicone tubing had a compressed appearance at multiple locations.The outer silicone tubing had what appeared to be internal abrasions at multiple locations.Abrasions most likely caused by the presence of a tie-down were noted.The inner silicone tubing of the lead coils is abraded open.The lead assembly had dried remnants of what appear to have once been body fluids inside the inner and the outer silicone tubing.No obvious point of entrance was noted other than the identified tubing openings and the end of the returned lead portion.No anomalies or discontinuities were found.An evaluation could not be made on the portion that was not returned.No further relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key6820093
MDR Text Key83629635
Report Number1644487-2017-04360
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/11/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/25/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/30/2004
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number9502
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/28/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received01/09/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/03/2002
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age23 YR
-
-