|
Continued : erbe electrosurgical generator.Investigation evaluation: an evaluation of the three photos provided by the user confirmed the report on anchor separation at the distal end of the catheter.Our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved also confirmed the cutting wire securing component located near the distal end of the sphincterotome has disconnected from the catheter.The cutting wire is intact and remains securely attached to the sphincterotome at the proximal end.However, due to the catheter and securing component disconnection, the distal end of the cutting wire is no longer connected to the sphincterotome catheter at the distal end.The securing component has a longer section measuring 3 mm and a shorter section measuring 2 mm, therefore no part of the device is missing.The cutting wire shows evidence of cautery application.A visual examination of the catheter showed a kink at approximately 68 cm from the proximal end.The wire guide pre-loaded into this device was included in the return.A visual examination of the wire guide showed no kinks/bends.A product discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to this reported occurrence was not observed.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: a definitive cause for this observation could not be determined because the actual use conditions could not be duplicated in the laboratory setting.Due to a variety of clinical conditions such as patient anatomy, endoscope position or progression of disease state, we could not reproduce the actual conditions of product usage during our laboratory analysis.This limits our ability to conclusively determine a cause.In the additional information provided, the user stated that the reported observation occurred prior to cautery application.During the evaluation of the returned device, a visual examination of the cutting wire showed blackening (evidence of cautery application).The instructions for use advise the user: "following electrosurgical unit manufacturer's instructions, verify desired settings and proceed with sphincterotomy." separation of the cutting wire securing component and the catheter can occur if the tip of the sphincterotome is over flexed.The instructions for use caution the user: "do not over flex or bow tip beyond 90 degrees, as this may damage or cause cutting wire to break." if the elevator of the endoscope remains in the closed/up position when retraction of the sphincterotome is attempted and additional pressure is applied, this could have contributed to separation of the catheter and cutting wire securing component.The instructions for use caution the user: "elevator should remain open/down when advancing or retracting sphincterotome." this activity will aid in device preservation.The user is advised to advance the sphincterotome in short increments until it is visible endoscopically.The instructions for use state: "advance tip of sphincterotome into endoscope accessory channel and continue to advance in short increments until device is endoscopically visible." other factors that can contribute to separation of the cutting wire securing component and the catheter include manipulating the handle with the catheter in a coiled position or with the precurved stylet inside the cannulating tip.The instructions for use advise the user: ¿upon removing device from package, uncoil and straighten sphincterotome." the user is then instructed: "carefully remove precurved stylet from cannulating tip.¿ the instructions for use contain the following comment: "note: do not exercise handle while device is coiled or precurved stylet is in place, as this may cause damage to the sphincterotome and render it inoperable." prior to distribution, all d.A.S.H.Dometip double lumen sphincterotomes are subjected to a visual inspection and functional test to ensure device integrity.The functional test includes bowing the sphincterotome to ensure the distal end responds to handle manipulation.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|