• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER; DQY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER; DQY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PXSLIMSTR
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/30/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2017-01465.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the gastric artery using ruby coils.During the procedure, while attempting to advance a ruby coil through a px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim), the physician experienced resistance; therefore, the px slim and ruby coil were removed.The procedure was completed using a new ruby coil and another px slim.It addition, there was no noted damage to the px slim after removal.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim) was kinked approximately 2.5 cm from the hub.Evaluation of the returned devices revealed that the ruby coil¿s embolization coil windings were offset and the pusher assembly was kinked in multiple locations.The offset coil winding likely occurred due to forceful advancement against resistance.If the device is continuously advanced against resistance, damage such as a kinked pusher assembly may occur.The od of the embolization coil was measured and found to be within specification.Evaluation of the returned px slim revealed that the microcatheter was kinked.This type damage likely occurred due to improper handling during use.If the device is manipulated with force during use, damage such as a kink may occur.The kink in the px slim likely contributed to the resistance experienced by the physician during advancement.The returned ruby coil could not be advanced past the kinked located on the returned px slim.The returned ruby coil could be advanced through a demonstration px slim with some resistance.A demonstration ruby coil could not be advanced pass the kink in the returned px slim.Penumbra coils and catheters are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2017-01465.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER
Type of Device
DQY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key6835965
MDR Text Key84369225
Report Number3005168196-2017-01466
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQY
UDI-Device Identifier00814548016436
UDI-Public00814548016436
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
PMA/PMN Number
K100826
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/10/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/31/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date01/06/2020
Device Catalogue NumberPXSLIMSTR
Device Lot NumberF73551
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/31/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/08/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/06/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age50 YR
-
-