• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANATOMAGE ANATOMAGE GUIDE; SURGICAL GUIDE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANATOMAGE ANATOMAGE GUIDE; SURGICAL GUIDE Back to Search Results
Device Problems Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Compatibility Problem (2960)
Patient Problem Perforation (2001)
Event Date 07/11/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This incompatibility issue is due to miscommunication about which instrumentation the doctor owned.
 
Event Description
Due to compatibility issue with the handles and the sleeves, doctor could not use the surgical guide for dental implant surgery.Doctor freehanded the surgery but was not successful.Implant 28 failed; drill slipped out the lingual.Other implants are not parallel as he wanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ANATOMAGE GUIDE
Type of Device
SURGICAL GUIDE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANATOMAGE
303 almaden blvd
suite 700
san jose CA 95110
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANATOMAGE
303 almaden blvd
suite 700
san jose CA 95110
Manufacturer Contact
phyo soe
303 almaden blvd
suite 700
san jose, CA 95110
4088851474
MDR Report Key6836697
MDR Text Key84301833
Report Number3008272529-2017-00022
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NDP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Dentist
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/19/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Dentist
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/08/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/19/2017
Initial Date FDA Received08/31/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/03/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age85 YR
Patient Weight59
-
-