|
(b)(4).The other two armada 35 devices are filed under separate medwatch report numbers.Evaluation summary: visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported balloon rupture was confirmed.It is likely that the balloon rupture is the result of interaction with the heavily calcified lesion.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history revealed no other incidents.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|