• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BRAINLAB AG CRANIAL NAVIGATION SOFTWARE (VERSION 3.0); IMAGE GUIDED SURGERY SYSTEM/INSTRUMENT, STEREOTAXIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BRAINLAB AG CRANIAL NAVIGATION SOFTWARE (VERSION 3.0); IMAGE GUIDED SURGERY SYSTEM/INSTRUMENT, STEREOTAXIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 22216
Device Problems Use of Device Problem (1670); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/28/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A risk to the patient's health could not be excluded for these specific circumstances, since a biopsy was applied in a different location in the brain than anticipated with the brainlab device involved, and the desired diagnostic sample was not retrieved, despite according to the surgeon: the surgery was to retrieve a diagnostic sample, not to remove or treat the lesion.The burr hole was in the intended location, and there were no further unplanned biopsy paths applied at this surgery.There was no (direct or increased) risk to harm a critical brain structure (e.G.Blood vessels or important brain tissue) due to the applied biopsy or path.There were no negative effects to the patient, neither due to biopsies nor surgery/anesthesia time (of ca.45 min.) other than planned revision biopsy surgery, there are no remedial actions necessary, done or planned for this patient.Hospitalization did not need to be prolonged either.According to the results of the brainlab investigation and the information provided by the hospital, it can be concluded that the root cause for the biopsies taken in a location different than anticipated with navigation involved, is that is that the patient's head in the head holder most likely moved during the surgery.As a further contributing factor, a shift of the patient's brain might have occurred in between the pre-op mri and the anatomical situation during the surgery, e.G.Due to the bone flap and/ or loss of cerebrospinal fluid.Apparently the resulting deviation between displayed navigation information and the actual patient anatomy was not detected with the necessary accuracy verification to be performed by the user.There is no indication of a systematic error or malfunction of the brainlab device (navigation).Corresponding brainlab measures to minimize this anticipated risk as low as reasonably practicable are already in place.Brainlab intends to re-iterate the relevant topics regarding the use of the device to this customer.
 
Event Description
A cranial surgery for a biopsy (for retrieval of a diagnostic sample) of a lesion with a size of ca.21mm, located deep in the brain, has been performed with the aid of the brainlab navigation version 3.0.A pre-operative mri scan was acquired the same day of the surgery, to use with navigation.A trajectory was planned for the procedure.During the procedure the surgeon: positioned the patient in a lateral orientation.Performed the initial patient registration on the pre-op mri with surface matching to match the display of the navigation to the current patient anatomy.Verified the accuracy of the registration and determined the result as good.Removed the unsterile navigation reference array and draped the patient.Attached a sterile reference array, re-verified accuracy and aligned the navigated instrument guide to the planned trajectory with entry point.Rotated the instrument guide away from the surgery area, and created a burr hole corresponding to the entry point.Performed the biopsy with a navigated biopsy needle aligning to the planned trajectory with initial sample taken along the anticipated superior border of lesion.Pathology informed that this sample is non-diagnostic.Navigated the needle further (deeper) and took additional samples.Closed the patient and concluded the surgery.A post-op ct indicated that the samples were taken ca.5mm away from the planned trajectory.The desired diagnostic sample from the lesion was not retrieved , and a revision biopsy surgery is planned for this patient.According to the surgeon: the surgery was to retrieve a diagnostic sample, not to remove or treat the lesion.The burr hole was in the intended location, and there were no further unplanned biopsy paths applied at this surgery.There was no (direct or increased) risk to harm a critical brain structure (e.G.Blood vessels or important brain tissue) due to the applied biopsy or path.There were no negative effects to the patient, neither due to biopsies nor surgery/anesthesia time (of ca.45 min.) other than planned revision biopsy surgery, there are no remedial actions necessary, done or planned for this patient.Hospitalization did not need to be prolonged either.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CRANIAL NAVIGATION SOFTWARE (VERSION 3.0)
Type of Device
IMAGE GUIDED SURGERY SYSTEM/INSTRUMENT, STEREOTAXIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
BRAINLAB AG
olof-palme-strasse 9
münchen, 81829
GM  81829
Manufacturer (Section G)
BRAINLAB AG
olof-palme-strasse 9
münchen, 81829
GM   81829
Manufacturer Contact
markus hofmann
olof-palme-strasse 9
münchen, 81829
GM   81829
MDR Report Key6854421
MDR Text Key85752786
Report Number8043933-2017-00027
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HAW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K092467
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/22/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/11/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Model Number22216
Device Catalogue Number22216
Device Lot NumberSW V. 3.0
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/22/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/13/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-