|
As reported, catheter split/broke in patient and was removed on (b)(6) 2017.Port had been placed on (b)(6) 2017 by dr.(b)(6).The initial x-ray after the port placement showed the catheter in one piece.No sample will be returned, however x-rays of the device prior to removal were provided.
|
|
A review of the device history records (dhr) was performed for the indicated packaging and component lots for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The august 2017 angiodynamics complaint report was reviewed for the vortex port (triumph) product family and the failure mode "catheter detached (from port)." no adverse trends were indicated.The used device was not returned to angiodynamics, however x-ray images were provided.Based on the x-rays supplied from the hospital, the complaint of "catheter detached from port" is deemed confirmed.A potential root cause for the catheter detaching from the port may be that responsible employees failed to properly assemble the device per angiodynamics' procedures, and did not identify the non-conforming unit during their inspections.(this device is supplied to the end user with the catheter already attached to the port.).The operator involved in performing the procedures, according to the dhr, is no longer employed by angiodynamics, however had been trained at the time of employment.The instructions for use provided with the device include instructions on port placement, usage, and potential complications.((b)(4)).
|