• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH MRS SML FEM STEM 8 X 102MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH MRS SML FEM STEM 8 X 102MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 64853008
Device Problems Break (1069); Fracture (1260)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Injury (2348)
Event Date 08/11/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Review of the device history records indicate the devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
Patient reported a primary knee operation on (b)(6) 2016.During a follow-up with their physician, the stem was found to have a rupture.The stem is cemented to the femur.The physician found the stem appears to be curved, which is causing pain on the femur.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding fracture involving an mrs stem was reported.The event was confirmed.Visual inspection of the mrs stem indicates that the stem is fractured through the shaft.Material analysis of the stem concluded that the stem fractured in fatigue.Eds showed the stem was consistent with astm f1536 alloy.No material or manufacturing defects were observed on the surfaces examined.-medical records received and evaluation:a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: i have seen the info for this patient with a mrs femoral stem fracture at 1-year post implantation.The mar confirms a fatigue fracture without device-related aspects.There are two x-rays, one of which almost only shows the mrs/gmrs devices in the femur after a large segmental resection.The other x-ray confirms the proximal stem fracture although the cause of the problem does not become quite clear.There are some relative factors to contribute to the problem such as a relatively small diameter stem but it does still fill the present femoral canal very well, consistent with the young age of the patient (36-years) with rather thick femoral cortices.The x-rays are rather blurry and do not show very well detail.No other clinical information is available such as about the patient history and the previous surgery performed.As such, no clear diagnosis about the failure mode can be established and this case needs more info to solve, especially clinical information plus more and better quality x-rays.So, the only positive information available is that no device-related factors were present according to the mar which leaves failure mode probably as an adverse mix of patient-related and procedure-related factors about which there is currently not enough information to further detail and differentiate these aspects.-device history review: indicated that the devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: indicated that there have been no other similar reported events for the lot referenced.Visual inspection of the mrs stem indicates that the stem is fractured through the shaft.Material analysis of the stem concluded that the stem fractured in fatigue.Eds showed the stem was consistent with astm f1536 alloy.No material or manufacturing defects were observed on the surfaces examined.Based on clinician review of the x-rays provided the investigation indicated that the x-rays provided are rather blurry and do not show very well detail.No other clinical information is available such as about the patient history and the previous surgery performed.As such, no clear diagnosis about the failure mode can be established and this case needs more info to solve, especially clinical information plus more and better quality x-rays.So, the only positive information available is that no device-related factors were present according to the mar which leaves failure mode probably as an adverse mix of patient-related and procedure-related factors about which there is currently not enough information to further detail and differentiate these aspects.No further investigation is possible at this time.If additional information become available such as better quality x-rays, patient history and further clinical information, this investigation will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Patient reported a primary knee operation on (b)(6) 2016.During a follow-up with their physician, the stem was found to have a rupture.The stem is cemented to the femur.The physician found the stem appears to be curved, which is causing pain on the femur.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MRS SML FEM STEM 8 X 102MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-LIMERICK
raheen business park
limerick NA
Manufacturer Contact
brian lauro
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key6862730
MDR Text Key86076768
Report Number0002249697-2017-02755
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeMX
PMA/PMN Number
K040749
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/04/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/01/2019
Device Catalogue Number64853008
Device Lot Number131874C1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/22/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/16/2017
Initial Date FDA Received09/13/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/07/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/04/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age36 YR
Patient Weight50
-
-